The Crimson Bench

Glossary / strategy

Strategy Map

A visual one-page representation of the cause-and-effect relationships between strategic objectives across the Balanced Scorecard's four perspectives, making organizational strategy visible and communicable.

Full Definition

A Strategy Map, developed as a companion tool to the Balanced Scorecard by Kaplan and Norton, is a one-page visual representation of the company's strategy showing how strategic objectives in each of the four BSC perspectives causally connect to drive financial outcomes. The map reads bottom-up: Learning and Growth objectives (develop employee capabilities, enhance information systems) enable Internal Process objectives (improve quality, reduce cycle time, accelerate innovation), which create Customer outcomes (improve satisfaction, increase retention, expand market share), which produce Financial results (revenue growth, margin expansion, asset utilization improvement). The visual format makes strategic logic immediately communicable to all stakeholders. The Strategy Map's primary value is in making strategy explicit and communicable. Most organizations have strategy documents that are dense text read only by senior leaders, strategic plans that are translated inconsistently by different departments, and executives who describe the company's strategy in different terms depending on who is asking. A one-page Strategy Map that all senior leaders have co-created and committed to eliminates these alignment failures—every executive can point to the same visual representation of how their functional objectives connect to company strategy. Board presentations anchored to the Strategy Map ensure strategic discussions focus on the right connections rather than isolated metrics. Building a Strategy Map forces an important discipline: testing whether the causal hypotheses embedded in the strategy are genuinely valid. If the map shows that "improve employee technical skills" causes "reduce system downtime," management must track whether that causal relationship actually materializes—providing evidence-based strategy validation rather than faith-based assumptions. Organizations that treat the Strategy Map as a living document, validating and refining causal hypotheses as data accumulates, develop genuine strategic learning capabilities that make them more adaptive than organizations treating strategy as immutable planning documents.

FAQs

How detailed should a Strategy Map be?

A Strategy Map should have 15-25 strategic objectives total across all four perspectives—enough to represent the full strategic theory without becoming too complex to communicate effectively. Each objective should be a short noun phrase (not a full sentence) describing the desired strategic outcome: 'Deepen key account relationships' not 'We will improve our relationships with key customers by deploying dedicated account management resources and quarterly business reviews.' The visual representation should fit on one page and be comprehensible in 3 minutes.

Can small companies use a Strategy Map?

Yes—Strategy Maps are arguably more valuable for smaller companies than large ones because they force prioritization discipline at precisely the stage when many opportunities are competing for limited management attention. A $20M revenue company with 5 executives can build a simplified 12-15 objective map that aligns the entire leadership team around the same strategic theory. The process of building it is as valuable as the output—surfacing disagreements about strategic priorities before they manifest as resource conflicts.

Relevant Executive Roles

The Crimson Bench · Est. 2002 · Founded in New York City

Deploy an Executive in 48 Hours

Verified corporate accounts only. Ivy League-educated. Flat-rate pricing. 14-day no-cause cancellation.

25,000+ Ivy League Executives · 150,000+ Global Consultants · 48-Hour Deployment