Full Definition
Long-Term Incentive (LTI) programs provide compensation that vests over periods of 2-5 years, creating retention incentives and aligning leadership with sustained value creation rather than solely with annual performance outcomes. LTI awards take several forms: equity grants (stock options, RSUs, performance shares for public or pre-IPO companies), phantom equity or profit interest units (for private companies who want to provide equity economics without actual equity issuance), cash-based LTIPs (performance cash awards vesting over 3 years based on cumulative metrics), and management carve-out plans (PE-specific structures providing value participation at exit). The vesting structure—requiring continued employment to vest the award—is the primary retention mechanism. LTI program design requires careful alignment between performance metrics and time horizon. Annual bonus metrics capture performance in the current year; LTI metrics should capture cumulative value creation and strategic outcomes that take longer to manifest. For public companies, Total Shareholder Return (TSR)—either absolute or relative to a peer index—is the most common LTI performance metric because it directly measures the value delivered to shareholders over the measurement period. For private companies, EBITDA growth and revenue CAGR over the holding period serve similar functions, though exit multiple expansion (driven by strategic positioning, market perception, and business quality) is often the largest value creation driver that neither annual bonus nor EBITDA-based LTIP fully captures. LTI program governance requires board compensation committee oversight to ensure that award levels are calibrated appropriately (not over-dilutive for public companies; not creating perverse retention cost for the business), performance metrics are genuinely stretching rather than nearly guaranteed to pay out, and the program is competitive with peer companies for attraction and retention purposes. Compensation committees also oversee the discretion to modify awards when extraordinary events (COVID-19 business disruption, macroeconomic shocks) make original targets impossible to achieve through normal operations—balancing the integrity of the original performance commitment against the retention purpose the program is designed to serve.
FAQs
What LTI structure works best for a PE-backed company?
PE-backed companies most commonly use management carve-out plans (providing a share of exit proceeds above a threshold) or phantom equity/profit interest units as their primary LTI vehicle, because actual equity grants create cap table complexity and may conflict with investor rights. For operating company leadership below the top 5-7 executives covered by the PE sponsor's management carve-out, a synthetic LTIP (3-year cash awards based on EBITDA or equity value growth) provides retention and alignment economics without the legal and governance complexity of actual equity instruments.
How do LTI award sizes typically differ by executive level?
LTI award sizes as a percentage of base salary increase significantly by level. A director-level employee might receive an annual LTI grant worth 25-50% of base salary; a VP 50-75%; a C-suite leader 100-200%; and a CEO 200-400% or more. Public company CEO LTI grants at large-cap companies can be 500%+ of base salary, reflecting the predominance of equity in total CEO compensation. These ratios should be benchmarked against the same peer group used for total compensation benchmarking to ensure market competitiveness at each level.
Relevant Executive Roles
The Crimson Bench · Est. 2002 · Founded in New York City
Deploy an Executive in 48 Hours
Verified corporate accounts only. Ivy League-educated. Flat-rate pricing. 14-day no-cause cancellation.
25,000+ Ivy League Executives · 150,000+ Global Consultants · 48-Hour Deployment